Jamie Loeb vs Naomi Osaka Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
J. Loeb vs N. Osaka

Jamie Loeb
USA
w
l
l
l
l
w
l
w
w
l
1
Win
2
Played
1
Win
30
Age
28
1.68m
Height
1.80m
567
C. Rank
16
132
Best Rank
1
0
Total Titles
7
0
YTD Titles
0
$226.3K
Career Money
$24.1M
Right-handed (two-handed backhand)
Plays
Right-handed (two-handed backhand)

Naomi Osaka
JPN
w
w
w
w
l
l
w
l
w
w
1
Win
2
Played
1
Win
30
Age
28
1.68m
Height
1.80m
567
C. Rank
16
132
Best Rank
1
0
Total Titles
7
0
YTD Titles
0
$226.3K
Career Money
$24.1M
Right-handed (two-handed backhand)
Plays
Right-handed (two-handed backhand)
Head-to-head: Loeb 1 - 1 Osaka
They have played 4 sets in total, with Jamie Loeb winning 2 and Naomi Osaka winning 2. The last match between Naomi Osaka and Jamie Loeb was at the Rogers Cup - Toronto, 05-08-2017, Round: Q1, Surface: Hard, with Naomi Osaka getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Loeb | 1 |
| Osaka | 1 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(Q1) Rogers Cup - Toronto(08-05-17)
Naomi Osaka
6
6
Jamie Loeb
3
3
(R1) Sumter(05-20-13)
Jamie Loeb
6
7
Naomi Osaka
3
6
J. Loeb vs N. Osaka H2H Profile
J. Loeb vs N. Osaka Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Jamie Loeb has won 42.86% of points on their second serve, while Naomi Osaka has won 41.39%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Jamie Loeb, in recent form, has won 65.52% of their opponent's second serve points, while Naomi Osaka has won 50.00%. The same stats for first serve returns are 26.58% and 26.34% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Jamie Loeb has saved 41.18% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Naomi Osaka has saved 40.93% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Jamie Loeb has won 62.50% of matches played (W/L 25/15), with Naomi Osaka winning 70.00% (W/L 35/15) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Jamie Loeb has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 190/143), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 32% (W/L 8/17). Naomi Osaka has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 233/115), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 55% (W/L 24/20).
- Player level: In the last year, Jamie Loeb has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 62.16% of matches (W/L 23/14), where as Naomi Osaka has played most of their matches on the Masters series, winning 65.00% of matches (W/L 13/7). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Jamie Loeb winning 1 times and Naomi Osaka being victorious 1 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Jamie Loeb winning 2 and Naomi Osaka winning 2.
- The last match between Jamie Loeb and Naomi Osaka was at the Rogers Cup - Toronto, 05-08-2017, Round: Q1, Surface: Hard, with Naomi Osaka getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:36:31.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Jamie Loeb has played against opponents with an average rank of 423.1 while Naomi Osaka has played against players with an average rank of 95.82.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Jamie Loeb has won 64% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Naomi Osaka has won 59% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Jamie Loeb has converted 30.43% of breakpoint opportunities, and Naomi Osaka has converted 37.25% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Jamie Loeb vs Naomi Osaka Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. Loeb vs N. Osaka H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 19 | Games Won | 21 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
| 7 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 0:36:31 | Average Match Time | 0:36:31 |
| 48% (33/69) | 1st Serve % | 46% (25/54) |
| 70% (23/33) | 1st Serve Win % | 88% (22/25) |
| 31% (11/36) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (13/29) |
| 40% (2/5) | Break Pts Won % | 56% (5/9) |
| 35% (19/54) | Return Points Win % | 51% (35/69) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Loeb 45%, Osaka 49%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Loeb 55%, Osaka 55%.
Break Points Saved %: Loeb 58%, Osaka 59%.
J. Loeb Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 5-7 6-4 3-1 ret. | ||
Q3 | W | 6-4 6-4 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-4 6-3 | ||
R3 | L | 7-6(3) 6-2 | ||
R2 | W | 6-0 2-6 6-4 | ||
N. Osaka Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | L | w/o | ||
R2 | W | 7-6(6) 3-6 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 6-0 6-4 | ||
R2 | L | 7-6(2) 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 4-6 7-5 6-3 | ||

J. Loeb vs N. Osaka Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 53.91% (324/277) | YTD Win/Loss | 64.46% (341/188) |
| 53.36% (739/646) | Sets Win/Loss | 61.06% (740/472) |
| 51.27% (6503/6180) | Games Win/Loss | 54.72% (6143/5084) |
| 57.06% (190/143) | Hard Win/Loss | 66.95% (233/115) |
| 51.72% (90/84) | Clay Win/Loss | 60.00% (66/44) |
| 52.17% (36/33) | Indoor Hard W/L | 66.67% (18/9) |
| 32.00% (8/17) | Grass Win/Loss | 54.55% (24/20) |
| 0.24 | Aces Per Game | 0.43 |
| 1472 | Aces Total | 2348 |
| 0.28 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
| 1745 | Total Double Faults | 998 |
| 1:18:23 | Average Match Time | 1:9:32 |
| 520.09 | Average Opponent Rank | 380.26 |
| 54% (17485/32413) | 1st Serve % | 56% (15317/27213) |
| 65% (11351/17485) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (10996/15317) |
| 46% (6867/14927) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (5753/11895) |
| 47% (1765/3778) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (1395/3045) |
| 44% (14442/33101) | Return Points Win % | 43% (11585/27178) |
| 45.71% (16/19) | Slam W/L | 72.28% (73/28) |
| 37.50% (3/5) | Masters W/L | 62.76% (91/54) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 75.00% (6/2) |
| 42.59% (23/31) | Main Tour W/L | 59.29% (83/57) |
| 53.80% (255/219) | Challenger W/L | 65.79% (75/39) |
| 90.00% (27/3) | Futures W/L | 61.90% (13/8) |
| 54% (320/593) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 65% (338/517) |
| 50% (2/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 45% (54/119) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (65/122) |
| 50% (92/183) | Deciding Set Win % | 64% (104/162) |
| 83% (344/287) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (319/287) |
| 16% (344/56) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (319/31) |
| 14% (257/37) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 26% (210/55) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Wed, 03 Dec, 05:30 AM
PredictionWed, 03 Dec, 06:30 AM
PredictionWed, 03 Dec, 05:30 AM
PredictionWed, 03 Dec, 10:00 AM
PredictionWed, 03 Dec, 06:30 AM
PredictionWed, 03 Dec, 07:00 AM
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips

02 Dec 2025
Read Full Article →Panna Udvardy vs Diletta Cherubini Prediction – WTA Quito Open – 2nd December 2025 Best Bets

02 Dec 2025
Read Full Article →Alycia Parks vs Gabriela Andrea Knutson Prediction – WTA Open In Arte Angers Loire – 2nd December 2025 Best Bets

02 Dec 2025
Read Full Article →Martina Colmegna vs Oleksandra Oliynykova Prediction – WTA Quito Open – 2nd December 2025 Best Bets

02 Dec 2025
Read Full Article →Tatjana Maria vs Irene Burillo Prediction – WTA Quito Open – 2nd December 2025 Best Bets

02 Dec 2025
Read Full Article →Dalma Galfi vs Tereza Martincova Prediction – WTA W100 Dubai – 2nd December 2025 Best Bets

01 Dec 2025
Read Full Article →Aliona Bolsova vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Open In Arte Angers Loire – 1st December 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
09:30
H2H 0-0
H2H 0-0